In Australian prisons, strip-searches assault women and children. You need to listen

Early this week, the Australian Human Rights Commission, FIGJAM (Formerly Incarcerated Girls Advocates Melbourne), and Flat Out issued a joint report, Ending Strip Searching in Australian Prisons. The report offers eight key findings: there is no evidence of any relationship between strip searching and contraband detection; People in prison experience strip searches as acts of sexual assault and coercive control; strip searches are conducted routinely but rarely uncover dangerous items; less invasive alternatives expose strip searching as unnecessary; people in prison are routinely having their human rights breached by strip searches; children are being forced to strip in front of adult prison guards; the harms of strip searching compound the mass incarceration of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples; there is a crisis of secrecy in prison.

Consider the findings concerning children: “In most Australian jurisdictions, children as young as ten are incarcerated and can be subjected to strip searching. Based on data covering varying periods in 2021-2022, it is estimated that, on average, children were subjected to more than 300 strip searches each month in prisons across seven Australian jurisdictions. In the month of April 2022 alone, 127 strip searches were conducted on children at two New South Wales (NSW) youth prisons. Only three searches identified items.” These children are disproportionately “Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children, children with disability and drug and alcohol dependencies, and children with complex trauma.” Not that it should matter, but many of the children who have been strip searched were not incarcerated; they were visiting incarcerated parents. A child is a child is a child.

In 2021, we wrote, ““Excessive strip-searching shines light on discrimination of Aboriginal women in the criminal justice system”. An article with that headline appeared yesterday. While the research and argument of the article is unimpeachable, one wonders about the shining light. The discrimination against Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women by and in the Australian so-called criminal justice program is a longstanding open secret. In 2018, Human Rights Watch issued a report, which noted, “Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women in prison are the fastest growing prison population, and 21 times more likely to be incarcerated than non-indigenous peers.” A version of that statement, “Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women in prison are the fastest growing prison population”, had appeared in major reports in 201020112012201320142015,2016, and 2017. Now it’s 2021, and where are we?”

Where, indeed. This week’s report opens with a foreword by Aunty Vickie Roach, “strong, proud Yuin woman”. The foreword begins, “As a strong, proud Yuin woman who was subjected to strip searches while caged in custody, I can tell you that it is state–sanctioned sexual assault. It is akin to being ambushed, raped and forced to strip naked in front of screws dressed in deliberately authoritarian, intimidating uniforms.” The foreword ends, “I have always fiercely advocated for people in prison, that they are deserving of dignity, and that their human rights must be respected. For us to be called human, we must respect everyone’s human rights. I have told my story far and wide – I have told the prisons, I have told the government, I have told the media and I have told the Yoorrook Justice Commission. Now I am telling you. And you need to listen.”

You need to listen.

(By Dan Moshenberg)

(Illustration: Judy Kuo / Human Rights Law Centre)

“I’m writing this letter so that you can hear my story. I need you to help us.”

“I’m writing this letter so that you can hear my story. I need you to help us …”

Therefore I shall speak not of “natural needs” but of the “existential limit to the satisfaction of needs”.
Agnes Heller, The Theory of Need in Marx

February began with ProPublica sharing letters written by children currently and previously detained at Dilley Immigration Processing Center in South Texas. There is no processing at Dilley, only the torture and abuse of children, children’s families, children’s communities, and therefore everyone. That was February 9, 2026. The article was entitled, ““I Have Been Here Too Long”: Read Letters from the Children Detained at ICE’s Dilley Facility.” Well, today is February 26, 2026, and ProPublica released an update, “Seized Art, Eavesdropping Guards: Parents Describe a Clampdown at Dilley Detention Center as Kids Shared Their Stories”. Dilley has tried to silence and throttle the kids by stealing their crayons, papers, pencils, artwork, all done in the name of “security”. The children just keep on writing and drawing, because they have to … because we need to hear them.

Seven-year-old Mathias Bermeo wrote: “I’m writing this letter so that you can hear my story. I need you to help us I have been detained for 23 days with my mom and my 3-year-old sister. I cry a lot I want to get out of here go back to my school they don’t treat us Well here there are many children we are kidnapped help!”

Dilley claims they are providing everyone with their “safety, security, and medical needs.”

Who do you believe? Whose version of “need” do you believe, that of a corporate spokesperson intoning the words you know they’d utter or that of a seven-year-old child who writes because he needs us to help him, his family, and community?

Nine-year-old Valentina writes, “I have been detained for a long time. My parents say it’s been 4 months but for me and my little sister Jireth it feels like a year I just want to go to the United States to be with my grandparents and finally end this nightmare that my family has had to live through, I feel like I’ve had the worst days of my life I want God to help us get out of here so we can be happy again and study together as a family. Please help us and our parents get out of here thank you.”

When you live in a nightmare, four months is a year.

I need you to help us.

They have been there too long. We have been there too long.

Thank you.

“My parents say it’s been 4 months but for me and my little sister Jireth it feels like a year …. “

 

(By Dan Moshenberg)

(Image Credits: ProPublica)

The path to neo-feudalism is written in letters of blood and fire

 

A headline in today’s Guardian reads, “Tax expert worried Australia on path to neo-feudal society as housing wealth drives inequality”. The article opens, “One of the country’s leading tax experts says the explosion in housing wealth has put Australia on the path towards a neo-feudal society where your prosperity depends in large part whether your parents own land or property.” The tax expert, Bob Breunig, then explains, “I don’t think we are back to pre-French Revolution times, but I am worried about that”. We should all be worried. But what exactly is neo about neo-feudalism? Absolutely nothing.

Global, national and local economies never stopped measuring jurisdictional wealth by housing wealth, both individual and sectoral. Landlords, banks, home owners never stopped being landlords, banks, homeowners. The capacity of one sector to evict members of another sector in the name of “development”, though often challenged, has never been broken and has always been codified into law. So .. what’s so neo about neo-feudalism? Absolutely nothing.

A couple hundred years ago, someone wrote, “The economic structure of capitalist society has grown out of the economic structure of feudal society. The dissolution of the latter set free the elements of the former. The immediate producer, the labourer, could only dispose of his own person after he had ceased to be attached to the soil and ceased to be the slave, serf, or bondsman of another. To become a free seller of labour power, who carries his commodity wherever he finds a market, he must further have escaped from the regime of the guilds, their rules for apprentices and journeymen, and the impediments of their labour regulations. Hence, the historical movement which changes the producers into wage-workers, appears, on the one hand, as their emancipation from serfdom and from the fetters of the guilds, and this side alone exists for our bourgeois historians. But, on the other hand, these new freedmen became sellers of themselves only after they had been robbed of all their own means of production, and of all the guarantees of existence afforded by the old feudal arrangements. And the history of this, their expropriation, is written in the annals of mankind in letters of blood and fire.”

Expropriation is written in the annals of humanity in letters of blood and fire. What’s so neo-about neo-feudalism? Absolutely nothing. Look around. What do you see?

(By Dan Moshenberg)

(Image credit: Thomas Hart Benton, “Casualty” /  State Historical Society of Missouri)

“Children are going to die in this country needlessly, more and more are going to die because of what’s happening here”

Two-month-old Juan Nicolás

“Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the kingdom of heaven.”                               Matthew 19:14

On February 17, 2026, PBS New reported, “The U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced recently it will not review Moderna’s mRNA flu vaccine despite late-stage trials showing it was safe and effective.” Dr. Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, noted, “This sent chills up the spines of all of us in public health and the vaccine world because it’s so arbitrary.” While an overwhelming majority of the FDA staff favored proceeding with the review, one member, Vinay Prasad, the chief medical and scientific officer and director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, killed the review. Even The Wall Street Journalobjected, in an editorial titled “Vinay Prasad’s Vaccine Kill Shot: Does the White House know the harm he’s doing to public health?” Yes, yes it does. Dr. Osterholm described the harm, “Children are going to die in this country needlessly, more and more are going to die because of what’s happening here”.

While the refusal to review was reversed on February 18, the reasons given were not that the government wanted to avoid the prospect of children dying in this country needlessly. They don’t.

On February 18, 2026, the same day the FDA reversed its decision, the San Antonio Current reported, “Two-month-old ICE detainee Juan Nicolás deported while sick with bronchitis”. Two-month-old Juan Nicolás was being held in the Dilley Immigration Processing Center. Two days earlier, the San Antonio Current reported that two-month-old Juan Nicolás was “choking on his own vomit… and having respiratory issues”. At that point, Juan Nicolás had spent a month, or half of his life, in detention. According to U.S. Representative Joaquin Castro, “His life is in danger.”

On February 17, the San Antonio Current reported that Juan Nicolás was “rushed to the hospital”, where he was diagnosed with bronchitis. Despite that diagnosis, Juan Nicolás was released and rushed back to Dilley.

Juan Nicolás will not die needlessly in this country … because, the following day, he was deported, rushed out of the country. U.S. Representative Joaquin Castro, explained, “After a discussion with their attorney, I have confirmed that Juan, his 16-month old sister, his mom and his dad have been deported. According to their attorney, the family was deported with only the money that they had in their commissary—a total of $190.” According to Univision reporter Lidia Terrazas, the family was “practically abandoned” in Mexico. Problem solved.

Children are going to die in this country needlessly, more and more are going to die because of what’s happening here.

(By Dan Moshenberg)

(Photo Credit: San Antonio CurrentInstagram / Lidia Terrazas)

“Even in Russia, they don’t treat children like this.”

A self-portrait Kamilla made while her parents spoke to NBC News.

“Was I sleeping, while the others suffered? Am I sleeping now? Tomorrow, when I wake, or think I do, what shall I say of today?”
Samuel Beckett, Waiting for Godot

NBC News released a report this week, “‘Even in Russia, they don’t treat children like this’: A family’s nightmare in ICE detention”. The report opens: “Nikita and his wife, Oksana, fled Russia in desperation two years ago, believing America was their only hope of giving their three children a life free of fear and oppression. Instead, those children are growing up behind the razor-wire fences of a South Texas detention center, among hundreds of other families swept up in President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown.” What else is there to say, really? Plenty.

The three children are Kirill, 13; Konstantin, 4; Kamilla, 12. The family has been held in Dilley Immigration Processing Center for four months … and counting.

Konstantin was once a social, outgoing child. Now, surrounded by guards, who “are just as tough as the guards at the adult facilities,” and constant sharp noises, Konstantin cries a lot and keeps to himself. Actually, the guards at Dilley are tougher than guards at adult facilities, inasmuch as they are “guarding” children. Other than guards, what precisely are the dangers the children face?

Kirill taught himself to play piano and then attended music school. A bright and talented child … who now “spends most days withdrawn, waking at night with anxiety and panic attacks”.

Kamilla is a dancer who loves to perform. She now has partial hearing loss, “thanks” largely to the conditions at Dilley, which include whatever is worse than substandard health and medical care. She now lives in constant pain, with little or no relief. When her mother made a makeshift headband, to cover and protect the ear, the guards removed it, claiming it was “contraband”. Kamilla cried. Again, what are the guards “guarding”?

With Kamilla’s birthday approaching, she was asked if she had any wishes. She replied she had only one, “To get out of here.”

Kamilla’s case is not an isolated one: “When several children fell ill with stomach ailments at Dilley, medical staff refused to treat them unless they had already vomited at least eight times.” A “medical staff” that refused to treat ill children is not a medical staff. Period.

In January of this year, an 18-month-old at Dilley had dangerously low blood-oxygen levels. The parents knew something was terribly wrong. For weeks, they begged for someone to address the child’s illness. No one did. Finally, after week, she was taken to a regional children’s hospital, where she was treated for treated her for pneumonia, Covid-19, RSV and severe respiratory distress. She stayed in the hospital for a ten days. She was prescribed medication. She was then returned to Dilley, where the “medical staff” refused to administer the drugs.

When “medical care” means refusal to care in any way, when the food is poisonous, when the “education” is such that children stop reading, when pianists go silent and the dancers sit all day, there can be only one wish: “To get out of here” Are we sleeping, while others suffer? Are we sleeping now? Tomorrow, when we wake, if we wake or think we do, what shall we say of today?

 

(By Dan Moshenberg)

(Image Credit: NBC News)

 

COMMENTS:

Mari: wow, this makes me cry. So sad, this is the moment to do something !!

How are we going to deal with this generation, with all the kids that are supposed to be playing and enjoying their life?

This week, yet again, the world abandoned and betrayed children. Not some children. All children. On Monday, ProPublica published two stories: “The Children of Dilley” and “I Have Been Here Too Long: Read Letters from the Children Detained at ICE’s Dilley Facility”. On Tuesday, The Guardian published a story: “Israeli court blocks life-saving cancer care for boy, 5, due to his Gaza address”. On Tuesday evening, PBS New Hour aired a story: “Mother recounts weeks in immigration custody with her U.S. citizen children.” That you need not read or watch any of these to know what they are saying and how these accounts of torturing children, all in the name of “national security” and even “democracy”, will make you feel, says it all, doesn’t it?

The ProPublica reporters spoke to more than two dozen current and former detainees, more than half of them children. They also collected letters from “more than three dozen kids”. I’ll share one of those letters, written by Maria Antonia Guerra Montoya, a nine-year-old child from Colombia. Antonia was detained for 113 days. The letter is in Spanish, translated into English by ProPublica:

““Name Maria Antonia Guerra Montoya

Country I am colombian

Age 9 years

Locked in custody how long 113 Days

I am Maria Antonia Guerra Montoya and I have been 113 days in detention I miss my friends and I feel they are going to forget me. I am bored here. I already miss my country and my house, I came on vacation for 10 Days and they took me into an ice office an officer interrogated me 2 hours without my mom, I was traveling with flight attendant because my mom lives in new york, they only wanted to arrest my mom, because my mom didn’t have documents to live in U.S.A., I always traveled with my tourist visa but ice used me to catch my mom and now I am in a jail and I am sad and I have fainted 2 times here inside. When I arrived every night I cried and now I don’t sleep well, I felt that being here was my fault and I only wanted to be on vacation like a normal family.

They don’t give me my diet I am vegetarian, I don’t eat well, there is no good education and I miss my best friend julieta and my grandmother and my school I already want to get to my house.

Me in dilei [Dilley] am not happy please get me out of here to colombia.

Antonia”

Meanwhile, in “another part of the world”, “an Israeli court has rejected an appeal to allow a five-year-old Palestinian boy with an aggressive form of cancer to enter Israel for life-saving treatment, citing a government policy that bars residents registered in Gaza from crossing the border, even when they no longer live there.” The child is five years old. Since 2022, he has lived in the West Bank, where he has been receiving medical care he could not get in Gaza, but now he needs a bone marrow transplant or he will die. The court rejected his family’s petition, arguing that the petition was “an indirect challenge to the security establishment’s post-7 October restrictions, which have prevented Gaza residents from entering Israel for medical treatment.” Imagine the security threat a dying five-year-old child presents to the nation-State. As one local human rights organization explained, “The significance of this ruling is that the court is providing backing for an unlawful policy that effectively condemns children to death, even when life-saving treatment is in reach.”

PBS focused on Jackie Merlos, a Honduran woman who was returning from Canada to her home in Washington State. Ms. Merlos was accompanied by her four children, all of whom are U.S. citizens. The five were detained and sent to an ICE processing center in Tacoma, Washington, Ms Merlos and her four children were kept for four weeks in a windowless room. After four weeks, the children were released. Ms. Merlos spent another 100 days in custody. As PBS noted, Ms. Merlos has “a temporary legal status while her full visa is pending. She has no criminal history.” Here is part of what she said:

“They treat us not as human beings. They treat us more than animals. The detention center wasn’t good for — to have a family there. My kids started having so much hunger of all the stress and trauma that they were going through …. We live in fear. My kids live in fear. Those 14 days and four months that I spent in detention were really, really bad for them, because there’s been so much trauma ….They are not the happy kids that they were before our detention … My kids are living in fear. It’s, what we’re going to do with all this generation that are living in fear, even knowing that they are citizen of United States? They don’t have rights anymore …. How are we going to deal with this generation, with all the kids that are supposed to be playing and enjoying their life?”

How are we doing to deal with this generation? How are they going to deal with our question to them, “How would you like your execution, swift or slow?”

 

 

(By Dan Moshenberg)

(Illustrations: ProPublica)

A Winter of Anguish for Minneapolis Children

But now, ah now, to learn from crises of anguish, advancing, grappling with direst fate and recoiling not,

And now to conceive and show to the world what your children en-masse really are.

                                    Walt Whitman, “Long, too long America

A Winter of Anguish for Minneapolis Children”. That’s the headline of an article in today’s New York Times, and really … what else is there to say? As the United States approached its nineteenth-century civil war, Walt Whitman asked if we were capable of show the world what our children en-masse really are. Are we? By something like a popular vote, “citizens” of the United States elected a government hell bent on imposing suffering on our children, en-masse.

Whitman ended his brief, five-line poem: “(For who except myself has yet conceiv’d what your children en-masse really are?)” Who indeed.

(By Dan Moshenberg)

(Image: Henri Matisse, “.L’Angoisse qui s’amasse en frappant sous ta gorge…”  – “The Gathering Anguish That Strikes in Your Throat”/ Museum of Modern Art)

 

On Martin Luther King Day

 

If elected, Amanda Burrows would be Vancouver’s first renter and woman mayor

Amanda Burrows

Who sets housing policy where you live? Renters? Homeowners? Or both? Does anyone in charge of housing policy in your area really know anything about the experience of facing eviction or, more drastically, of being evicted? Recently, Amanda Burrows announced her candidacy for the mayoral nomination of Vancouver. Burrows is “a prominent social justice advocate in Vancouver” as well as Executive Director of FIRST UNITED, a faith-based community services provider. Vancouver is Canada’s least affordable city. Burrows knows that. As she explained in a recent interview, “I have been evicted before, which is so many people’s stories in this city: being severed from the community and not finding a place to live because there’s barely any vacancy and it’s so expensive. I couldn’t even find a place if I wanted to.”

Burrows explicitly raises the question of renter representation in her campaign. In a world in which global, national and local economies have equated “wealth” and “development” with greater and growing inequality, increasing numbers of people are facing the varied and yet not so varied landscapes of “affordable housing crisis”. Part of that means more and more folks are renting. For example, according to a recent report, in the United States “the share of first-time home buyers dropped to a record low of 21%, while the typical age of first-time buyers climbed to an all-time high of 40 years”. That means many are putting off buying a home, and leaving the rental markets, for over a decade.

In 2022, researchers from Boston University and the University of Georgia published a report, “Who Represents the Renters?” The researchers pored over the data concerning 10,000 local, state and federal officials. Guess what they concluded? “We find that renters are starkly underrepresented by a margin of over 30 percentage points—a gap that persists across a variety of institutional and demographic contexts. Public officials are substantially more likely to own single-family homes that are more valuable than other homes in their neighborhoods. Collectively, these findings suggest deep representation inequalities that disadvantage renters at all levels of government.” 89% of city councilors were homeowners in sample cities where homeownership hovered around 51%. 83% of mayors and 76% of city councilors were homeowners. Finally, the average homeowning officeholder’s property was worth 50% more than the median value in their ZIP code.

The report concludes, “The underrepresentation of renters among elected officials is troubling and affects the kinds of policies discussed on the local and national stages.” Troubling, indeed. The troubling is not about this councilmember or that mayor, but about the composition of the body that decides, and in many instances creates, housing policy, and therefore housing itself. You may or may not live in Canada or the United States, but wherever you live, the question of renters and homeowners pertains. Amanda Burrows may or may not be elected, although I for one wish her well. The question here is the question asked by researchers a few years ago, as by researchers in mid-nineteenth century England: Who sets housing policy where you live? Renters? Homeowners? Or both? Does anyone in charge of housing policy in your area really know anything about the experience of facing eviction or, more drastically, of being evicted? Who speaks, whose voices and experiences are excluded?

Homeownership rates by office category

(By Dan Moshenberg)

(Photo Credit: Kate Hyslop / The Tyee) (Infographic: Katherine Levine Einstein, Joseph T. Ornstein & Maxwell Palmer, Who Represents the Renters)

If we are serious about housing affordability for wage earners

“If we are serious about housing affordability for wage earners, we must understand that the market alone will not deliver it.” Patrick Condon

On October 27, England (but not Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland) officially enacted the long-awaited Renters’ Rights Act: “Central to the Act is its provision to abolish Section 21 ‘no fault’ evictions, under which private landlords have been able to remove tenants even if they have done nothing wrong.” Between July 2024 and June 2025, 11,400 households suffered Section 21 no fault evictions. There is no count of how many people found themselves homeless as a result. As happens so often, the term “households” conceals as much as it reveals, but suffice it so say, tens of thousands of people were given two months to find a place, people who had done nothing wrong and now faced homelessness. Again, “homelessness” covers as much as it conceals. Numbers exist for those in shelters or seeking assistance. No one knows how many moved in with family or friends … “temporarily”.

While the Renters’ Rights Act is a welcome change, and not only because of the abolition of Section 21, some must wonder why it took so much to eliminate no-fault eviction, and why it takes so much to do so in other countries, such as the United States? No fault eviction was always wrong, always a violation of people’s human dignity and human and civil rights, but in a climate in which living on the streets has itself become criminalized, it’s even worse.

The Renters’ Rights Act does more than abolish Section 21. It also bans landlords from refusing tenants that receive benefits or that have children and establishes a new Private Rented Sector Landlord Ombudsman, where renters will be able to register complaints about landlords. Furthermore, landlords will not be able to raise the rent above the “market rate”. Landlords will not be allowed to allegedly respond to “bidding wars” by demanding a rent greater than the advertised one. Finally, landlords will be prohibited from asking for more than one month’s rent upfront from tenants.

This welcome news should have happened long ago. The housing crisis didn’t happen overnight. Renters, housing advocates, homeless service providers and others have long campaigned for these measures and more. Building more, rezoning, controlling landlord behavior, raising wages for low-income workers, regulating the market, controlling land prices and values have to happen together. This has been public knowledge for decades.

Vienna has been investing in and supporting social, aka public, housing for decades, and it’s paid off. While the city’s not paradise, it’s a practical response to unaffordable housing. Or take Melbourne. Until 2021, Melbourne was the second most expensive city in Australia. That’s when the city decided that that was an unacceptable situation. Melbourne built more, and it controlled real estate investing, by taxing real estate investors, taxing platforms like Airbnb, taxing vacant properties and land. Will Melbourne’s success continue? Who knows, the point is that the city recognized the patterns.

At midnight tonight, Vancouver will close public comment on the Vancouver Official Development Plan, a plan described as ambitious, thoughtful and well-crafted in vision and intent, on one hand, and faltering in diagnosis and prescription. In the next week or so, voters in the Netherlands and New York City will make their decisions largely based on candidates’ and parties’ promises, proposal, and plans for affordable housing. Let’s make sure the focus is on the residents, the people, living the crisis, rather than the buildings.

(By Dan Moshenberg)

(Image Credit: Blandford Fletcher, “Evicted” (1887) / Queensland National Art Gallery)