Chronicle of a death foretold: Eviction’s `adverse impact’ on parenting college students

New America, in collaboration with Princeton’s Eviction Lab, released a brief this week, “Ousted from Opportunity: Eviction’s Adverse Impact on Parenting College Students”. While the report is dire and grim and much of the findings are tragically predictable, it’s still worth consideration, especially this, the last of the major seven findings: “Parenting Students Threatened with Eviction Die at Higher Rates 10 Years Post-Enrollment: Parenting students who were threatened with eviction were more than twice as likely to die over the 10 years immediately following enrollment than parenting students who were not threatened (see Figure 8). Threatened parenting students’ mortality rates were even significantly higher than those of nonparenting students who were threatened with eviction.” What else is there to say? What more do you need to know? People who are parents and attending college have a difficult time, often and even typically. People who are parents and attending college who receive an eviction notice die relatively soon after. What more do you need to know?

The data concerning mortality rates come from a report published this month, “Consequences of Eviction for Parenting and Non-parenting College Students”. The authors found the following: “The mortality rate 10-years post-grad is 290 (200-380) per 100,000 for threatened parenting students compared to 140 (110-160) for non-threatened parenting students; in other words, an eviction filing is associated with a 107% increase in risk of death over the next ten years.” Where will you be in ten years? Where were you ten years ago?

To be clear, this slow-moving massacre does not concern parenting college students who have actually been evicted. This 107% increase in risk of death over the next ten years involves those who have had eviction filings. Who are they? You already know the answers. Parenting students disproportionately come from historically underserved groups. They are more likely to be women, especially women of color, and tend to be older. They are also more frequently first-generation college goers, low-income, and veterans. Student fathers are more likely to be Black than any other racial group. Parenting students have higher rates of food insecurity and are more likely to be working full time. 20% of undergraduate students care for one or more children while enrolled in college. What else is there to say?

The report had seven major findings. Parenting students threatened with eviction tended to be younger than parenting students not threatened by eviction. Parenting students threatened with eviction tend to come from lower-income backgrounds, compared to parents and non-parents who were not threatened with eviction. Black students, whether parenting or not, were far more likely to be threatened with eviction, but Black parenting students are the most at risk. Parenting students who were threatened are much more likely to identify as female, at 81%, compared to 63% of non-threatened parenting students. These are both extraordinarily high percentages. 37% of parenting students who were never threatened with eviction completed a bachelor’s degree, while only 15% of parenting students who were threatened completed a bachelor’s degree. Parenting students threatened with eviction had significantly reduced family income five years post-enrollment.

Parenting students who were threatened with eviction were more than twice as likely to die over the 10 years immediately following enrollment than parenting students who were not threatened

Twenty-two years ago, Achille Mbembe opened his seminal article “Necropolitics”, with these words, “The ultimate expression of sovereignty resides … in the power and the capacity to dictate who may live and who must die.” Who may live and who must die. A young person receives a notice saying they face eviction. No matter what happens, whether they are evicted or not, within ten years they are dead. What else is there to say? What more do you need to know?

Who may live … and who must die?

(By Dan Moshenberg)

(Image Credit 1: Day Gleeson and Dennis Thomas, “Title Deed Second Ave.” / hyperallergic)

(Image Credit 2: New America)

This will kill trans children, as I believe it is intended to

The Tennessee law the Supreme Court just upheld did not ban some special kind of transgender medicine. Rather, it denied transgender children access to the same life-saving medicines that doctors will continue to prescribe to cisgender children, who also sometimes need interventions in the development of secondary sex characteristics. The law is about denying basic medical care to transgender children, solely on the basis that they are transgender. This will kill trans children, as I believe it is intended to.

The complicity of virtually every newspaper in pushing the narrative of exceptional transgender medicine rather than the simple question of equal access to medical care paved the way for this decision and for the broader anti-trans hate movement.

It’s heartbreaking.

 

(By Angela Zimmerman)

(Image Credit: “Protect Trans Dreams”, Noah Grigni)

 

She simply glowed (Olorato Mongale did)

She simply glowed (Olorato Mongale did)

she simply glowed
Olorato Mongale did

past tense

she a child of the community
embraced and cared for
by many

passionate about journalism
and the fight against
Gender Based Violence
Olorato Mongale was

she did
she was

past tense

when will all
our war and our wars
be
past tense

(By David Kapp)

(Image Credit: Sofia Weidner / PBS)

 

Welcome to the age of the tolerated Intolerable

“To regard the lives of those your country is subjugating as being equal to your own would make even one death intolerable.” Owen Jones, 2014

In the past twenty-four hours, the word “intolerable” has figured prominently, a kind of keyword marking this moment. Perhaps what set this off is the joint statement by Canada, France and the United Kingdom, which deplored current Israeli actions in Gaza, adding, “The level of human suffering in Gaza is intolerable.” During his address to the House of Commons, Keir Starmer explained “I would like to say something about the horrific situation in Gaza, where the level of suffering innocent children being bombed again is utterly intolerable.” In an interview on the BBC yesterday, an aid worker, just returned from Gaza, called the withholding of food “simply intolerable.”

While any actions to end the atrocities being committed in Gaza are welcome, the question of timing hovers and with it the meaning of “intolerable”. What makes the situation “intolerable” today, rather than, say, three months ago, when the Israeli blockade of Gaza formally began? A complete blockade of any assistance to a population desperately needing aid and assistance is always meant to starve that population. The Israeli government said as much from the very beginning. For weeks, we’ve seen, read and heard reliable reports of children suffering malnutrition, hunger on their way to dying, or, for the “lucky ones”, “merely” living with the consequences of prolonged starvation for the remainder of their lives, however brief they may be. Wasn’t the situation simply intolerable then?

Intolerable: that which physically, mentally, or morally “cannot be tolerated, borne, or put up with; unendurable, unbearable, insupportable, insufferable.” It doesn’t mean that which no longer can be tolerated; it means that which, in its essence, cannot be tolerated. Again, while the recognition of the intolerable situation is preferrable to the denial, while any action emerging from that recognition is welcome, we live today with the painfully obvious fact of our ongoing, deepening and expanding capacity to tolerate the intolerable and thereby to contribute to the intolerable.

(By Dan Moshenberg)

(Image Credit: Simon Pemberton / The Guardian)

Landmark case: In Australia, Raya Meredith leads class action case against strip-searches

In 2018, at the Splendour in the Grass music festival in Byron Bay, New South Wales, Australia, Raya Meredith was strip-searched. Not that it matters, but nothing illegal was found. In 2022, then-27-year-old Raya Meredith filed a class action suit against the police of New South Wales, arguing that the strip-searches conducted at music festivals from 2016 to 2022 were unlawful and constituted assault, battery, and false imprisonment. Her landmark suit now represents 3,000 people who were strip-searched. That case is currently being heard in court. Today, Raya Meredith’s attorneys explained that the New South Wales police admitted the strip-search was unlawful but “objectively reasonably necessary.” What?

Kylie Nomchong, Raya Meredith’s attorney, responded to that claim, ““We get to the quite outrageous submissions … where the defendant is asking your honour to infer that it was objectively necessary to search the plaintiff’s breasts and genital area,” Nomchong told the court. It is unbelievably offensive to assert, without any evidence whatsoever, that there was some objectively reasonable basis on the part of the searching officer to inspect the plaintiff’s vagina, to ask her to pull out her tampon, to ask her to bare her buttocks and anal area and to bend over and drop her breasts. It’s just offensive.”

Justice Dina Yehia, the presiding judge in the case, agreed with Nomcholeng, “I’m not quite sure I understand those submissions, given the way this matter has proceeded.”

What else is there to say? For the police, the violation of a woman’s body and person was, and continues to be, “objectively reasonably necessary.” The objective and reasonable necessity of the strip-searches is so self-evident that just days before the hearing began, the police withdrew 22 witnesses, mostly police … because it was objectively reasonably necessary for them not to speak under oath.

Raya Meredith’s attorneys note that strip-searches seldom “work”, as in produce any evidence of illegal activity. But police engage in them anyway. So, what’s the point and purpose of strip-search? A study published in 2021, the year before Raya Meredith’s encounter with the police, considered the scale and scope of strip-searches conducted by New South Wales police from 2014 to 2018, As Raya Meredith’s attorneys suggest, most of those searches produced nothing, other than trauma and pain. Nevertheless, the use of strip-searches “at music festivals, at train stations, in police vehicles and at other locations” increased. What did the few strip searches that did produce any evidence of illegal activity show? 96% involved drugs, either possession or distribution: “It can be inferred from these data that the strip search regime is primarily being used for the enforcement of the summary offence of drug possession, rather than the serious indictable offences for which the power to strip search was envisaged.” A War on Drugs was declared, and strip-searches were normalized, naturalized, deemed “objectively reasonably necessary”.

When the State declares War on its population, as in a War on Drugs or a War on Crime, it declares a state of exception. That is, it declares a crisis so grave, so threatening to the State that the elimination, ostensibly temporary, of constitutional rights and protections is reasonably objectively necessary. The police in New South Wales were just following orders.

(By Dan Moshenberg)

(Image Credit: Roberto Matta, “Nuremberg Judgment” / MoMA)

We will run out (of gas by 2026)

 

We will run out (of gas by 2026)

sufficient wind
and solar power
is what we have
declared a minister
years ago

wind
air in motion
there is lots
amongst the tribe
of politrickians

politrickians
hot air
gaseous exchange
smoke and mirrors
flatulence clouding
the way (forward)

politrickians
of all shades
of shadiness
however bejewelled
and dressed-up
they tend(er) to be

We will run out
of gas by 2026
we hear all dramatic-like
like a politrickian
announcing
his or her rectitude

One thing we do know
Is that we won’t run out
of gaseous and windy
politrickians
now or ever

(no matter the smoke
white pink or black)

Can you imagine that

(A morning TV newsbyte sets this one off, 7 May 2025.)

(By David Kapp)

(Image Credit: Do Ho Suh, “Fart in the Wind” / Art Basel)

Michigan’s special hell for women, the Women’s Huron Valley Correctional Facility, belongs to everyone

I had said I wasn’t gonna write no more poems like this
Gil Scott-Heron

Michigan has one women’s prison, the Women’s Huron Valley Correctional Facility in Ypsilanti, and it is a piece of work. On Monday, attorneys representing 20 women filed a $500 million lawsuit, claiming that recorded and recording strip searches constitutes invasion of privacy, intentional abuse, and violation of rights. According to the filing, “Defendants … implemented a policy of recording strip searches that they knew or should have known would trigger trauma responses in a population with high rates of sexual abuse history …. What these women continue to endure is nothing short of horrific. This case exposes a grotesque abuse of power that directly retraumatizes survivors of sexual assault …. This history of problematic strip search practices at WHV demonstrates a recurring pattern.” Since its inception, Women’s Huron Valley Correctional Facility has a demonstrated recurring pattern of willful, intentional violence against women.

In 2012, Carol Jacobsen, founder and Director of the Michigan Women’s Justice and Clemency Projectnoted, “Abu Ghraib has nothing on Huron Valley.” She was describing the irony that Huron Valley was meant to solve the crisis of abuse of women prisoners in the Robert Scott Correctional Facility. As a result of widespread torture and abuse, Scott was closed in 2009, and all the women were moved to Huron Valley, which, according to Carol Jacobsen, was worse than Scott.

In 2014, Women’s Huron Valley Correctional Facility was investigated for human and civil rights abuses against mentally ill female patients.

In November 2015, a twenty-five-year-old Black woman, Janika Nichole Edmond died, or better was executed, in the Women’s Huron Valley Correctional Facility. Janika Edmond’s story is short and terribly familiar: Janika Edmond lived with mental illness. Once in Michigan’s `criminal justice’ system, her condition deteriorated. She had a history of assaulting prison guards, which resulted in her being sent to solitary, which resulted in her becoming more aggressive. The rate of `incident reports’ skyrocketed. No one did anything. In 2014, Janika Edmond made a rope out of a towel and tried to hang herself. Earlier in 2015, Janika Edmond was found with a razor. She said, repeatedly, that she was “tired of being here” and was hearing voices. Unfortunately, no one on staff heard or listened to Janika Edmond’s voice. The day she died, Janika Edmonds asked for a suicide prevention vest. The guards laughed. Hours later, she lay dead on the floor. “The death report provided by the MDOC [Michigan Department of Corrections] for Edmond shows her presumed cause of death was suicide.” That was no suicide. That was murder at the hands of the State.

In 2019, the Women’s Huron Valley Correctional Facility was sued for “perilous” conditionsAccording to the lawsuit, “The women have complained about the presence of mold in the facility for years, and continue to do so, but their pleas have been ignored.” Huron Valley “is operating under a state of degradation, filth, and inhumanity, endangering the health and safety of incarcerated women.” One of the attorneys described Huron Valley as “medieval and dungeon-like.” Three weeks ago, six years after the lawsuit was filed, a Michigan community forum heard the following, “The Women’s Huron Valley Correctional Facility is accused of having severe cases of black mold.”

Six years ago, we wrote, “Michigan’s only women’s prison, the Women’s Huron Valley Correctional Facility, is the architecture of shame in the United States of America. Michigan built a special hell for women, the Women’s Huron Valley Correctional Facility, and it’s been going on for years and it’s going on now. Have we no shame?” Nine years ago, we wrote, “What happened to Janika Nichole Edmond? Absolutely nothing out of the ordinary, just another Black woman crying out for help, dying in agony, “tired of being here.” In her death, she joins “the most common.” Who cares? Who cares? Who cares?”

How many more lawsuits will it take, how many more tortured and traumatized women, how many more corpses? How often must we discover the brutality of our “caring” before we finally demolish the special hell for women we have constructed not once but every day that we allow it to continue. Michigan’s special hell for women, Women’s Huron Valley Correctional Facility, belongs to each and every one of us.

(by Dan Moshenberg)

(Image Credit: Jenny Holzer,  MoMA)

The cruelty is the pointlessness

 

To sacrifice God for nothingness—this paradoxical mystery of the ultimate cruelty has been reserved for the rising generation; we all know something thereof already.
Friederich Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil

In a recent interview, a person who recently voted for Trump reflected on the pain and suffering imposed by the current reign of detention and deportation for immigrants: “You could say it seems really cruel, but at the same time, wasn’t it really cruel when we had an open border and just let all these people in?” No.

No matter one’s view on the “open border”, having an open border is not really cruel, and saying so empties the word cruel of all its meaning. From its inception, in the late 13th century, to today, cruelty has meant wanting to inflict suffering; taking pleasure in the pains of others; being completely devoid of kindness or compassion; being merciless, pitiless, hard-hearted. Being dead, and worse, inside.

The real issue isn’t the “correct” definition of cruelty, but rather the complete gutting of the word and concept. In what universe is the violence committed against immigrants equivalent to an “open border” (an entity which the United States never countenanced anyway, but that’s another conversation)? In what universe is the terror imposed upon children, women, men, nonbinary people, families and others equivalent to the free passage of migrants across a border, any border? In the universe of grievance, in which meaning become meaningless.

In the universe of grievance, any complaint becomes reality, and that reality imposes equivalence, which then becomes identity, and there you have it. And so really the open border, which again never existed, is the same as abducting, terrorizing and torturing the most vulnerable people and community. Isn’t it? Isn’t it? No.

No matter what aspect of social, political, economic, emotional, personal, environment or other justice you may be engaged in pursuing or caring about, the current administration is not only attacking it but trying to exterminate it and its exponents. More often than not, our responses have involved the discovery, “The cruelty is the point.” In 2018, Adam Serwer wrote “The Cruelty Is the Point”, noting, “President Trump and his supporters find community by rejoicing in the suffering of those they hate and fear.” In the same year, Julianne Hing wrote “For Trump, Cruelty Is the Point”, noting, “Under Trump, the country has embarked on an enforcement policy that willfully causes suffering and that doesn’t even factor into the decisions of desperate people trying to escape dangerous situations …. Like so much else with this administration, the US immigration agenda is now being driven by a disdain for the most vulnerable communities among us.”

Well, it’s 2025, and the “cruelty is the point” argument has returned. While at one level, the argument is correct: those supporting the current administrative policies take pleasure and find community by rejoicing in the pain and suffering they’re causing others. But the argument doesn’t go far enough. For those who formulate and implement the policies, the point is there is no point. There is no point to the policy, there is no point of no return, there is no middle point and no end point. There is only power, sacrificing all for nothingness. The cruelty is not the point; it’s the pointlessness.

(By Dan Moshenberg)

(Image Credit: Sandro Botticelli, “The Abyss of Hell” / Vatican Apostolic Library)

 

In England and Wales, where are the women? Still in prison, still awaiting trial, still under attack

In the United Kingdom, the Prison Reform Trust recently released its report, Resetting the approach to women’s imprisonment, which it describes as follows: “This briefing sets out the latest facts about women in contact with the criminal justice system in England and Wales. It contains statistics on the number of women imprisoned, the characteristics of women in prison and the drivers to their offending, as well as information about community-based services and solutions.” The only problem with this description is that many of the imprisoned women have not committed any offense. They are remand prisoners, women awaiting trial, women presumed innocent until proven guilty, women awaiting their day in court, their encounter, however brief, with due process.

According to the report, “The number of women in prison, especially on remand and on short sentences, has remained stubbornly high …. On 30 December 2024, 26% of women in prison were being held on remand. Almost nine in 10 women on remand are considered a low to medium risk of serious harm to the public. In 2023, 3,622 women were remanded into custody from the Magistrates’ Courts, of which 32% went on to receive a custodial sentence. By contrast, 2,639 women were remanded into custody from the Crown Courts and 54% went on to receive a custodial sentence. In 2023, 26% of self-harm incidents by women in prison were by those held on remand.”

Finally, despite the ongoing crisis of incarcerated women’s self-harm, they continue to be remanded to prison “for their own good”: “Women in contact with the criminal justice system who are considered to be in ‘mental health crisis’ are being remanded to prison for their ‘own protection’ or ‘as a place of safety’.”

While all of this is distressing and alarming, none of it is new or surprising, and therein lies the both the real crisis and the real shame. Consider the following, from these pages.

December 5, 2024: “According to the Howard League, “`proportion of women on remand is both higher than in the men’s estate and growing at a faster rate, and vulnerable women are still remanded to custody as a ‘place of safety’, while the government is struggling to keep women in prison safe …. Over half of the receptions into prison are of women on remand and a third are of women serving short sentences.’ Finally, according to arecent report from the National Police Chiefs’ Council, “Proportionately, more women than men are remanded in custody, and women remanded in custody at Crown Court are much less likely to go on to receive a custodial sentence than men (52% vs 71%).”

January 17, 2023: “Two-thirds of the women remanded to prison are found not guilty or given a community outcome. There are little to no services in the remand sections of prisons, and yet “acutely mentally unwell women” are remanded to prison, often.”

September 29, 2014: “Between 1997 and 2007, there was a 40% increase in the number of women in prison awaiting trial. In the same period, men prisoners awaiting trial decreased by 11%. More than 40% of women prisoners awaiting trial have attempted suicide at some point in their lives; for men that number is a little over 25%. Nearly two-thirds of women remand prisoners suffer from depression, a figure far higher than that of sentenced women prisoners. Half of all women on remand receive no visits from their family (for men, that number is 25%).”

Since at least 1997, the issue of the high incidence of women remand prisoners and of the mental health of many of those women has been pretty much public knowledge … and yet, decades later, here we are … again: “On 30 December 2024, 26% of women in prison were being held on remand. Almost nine in 10 women on remand are considered a low to medium risk of serious harm to the public.”

Part of the issue here is the gender constitution of due process.

In the United States, we hear and read and talk a great deal these days about due process, as it is being assaulted, battered, besieged by the current presidential administration. The concept itself first seems to have arisen in the Magna Carta. Clause 39 of the original 1215 version of the Magna Carta reads, “No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land.” Subsequent editions of the Magna Carta were shortened, and so, in 1354, Clause 39 became Clause 29, “No man of what state or condition he be, shall be put out of his lands or tenements nor taken, nor disinherited, nor put to death, without he be brought to answer by due process of law.”

Whatever the earlier, and later, authors may have meant by “man”, the practices of the State in terms of women make it clear that the centuries old exclusion of women continues, in the courts, in the police stations, in the prisons and jails, as well as in the streets. Women are disproportionately remanded to prison because they are women, because as women they are excluded from any sense of due process. Women haunt due process.

(By Dan Moshenberg)

(Image Credit: Smithsonian)

 

100 Days of Gomorrah: For Donald Trump and Project 2025

100 Days of Gomorrah: For Donald Trump and Project 2025

The Audacity of NOPE!

100 Days of Gomorrah.

With apologies to the Marquis De Sade and 1785 because;

The cruelty is the point in America 2025.

The first 100 days;

Rub tiny hands together to see what you can steal.

Negotiationbation.

Annexationbation.

Regressive Taxationbation.

Devastationbation.

Christian Nationbation.

Donationbation.

Humiliationbation.

Deportationbation.

Science Negationbation.

“You’re going to feel a little necessary pain”, he says
“But, soon you will begin to like it”.

“Please, Sir, may I have another” sing a choir of toadies.

A Phallic Sharpie Marker in his Orange Onan-ite hands — most men would choose a gun when they felt inadequate or premature.

But, the Sharpie is more powerful than the magnum;

More powerful than the tiny mushroom Stormy described.

Especially when you want to stick up the world.

“Get out of America by sundown”, he says.

Illustrating the idea that The Western is America’s structuring myth.

He — Orange Anti-Yellowstone — who wants to pave paradise and build parking lots;

And, oil fields.

Build idolatrous images in gold and guild;

And clear cut forest to dig out “good clean coal”.

Use third world countries as American Gulags and;

Encourage the construction of more Central American black site prisons for “home grown threats”.

Because that’s efficiency — you gotta make the bodies disappear;
No bodies no TRANSgressions of the Constitution.

The only “TRANS” tolerated in America today.

Turn this Den of Thieves into a House of the Rising Sun.

Let the White House be adorned like a brothel;
Where Mistress Melania will feel comfortable slapping your hands away.

Have his face adorn Mount Rushmore and rename a gulf in his image;

I wonder if anyone ever told him that cross cultural understanding,
Might have helped him and his cabinet more accurately predict China’s reaction;
To America’s unilateral institution of tarriffs?

The more you know.

He’s so drunk at the power orgy he doesn’t know who he’s fucking.

But, then, that’s easy.

He’s fucking us.

(By Heidi Lindemann and Michael Perry)

(Image Credit: Mark Rothko, “Red, Orange, Orange on Red” / St. Louis Art Museum)

Advocates working to improve the status of women in various environments can securely manage digital resources using the wallet login, trusted across the U.S.